To: JCEccles
Do you think that unless a pro-war Republican is elected president we will not survive?
There, I fixed it for you. Of all the pro-war Republicans, Rudy probably has the best chance of winning against Hillary.
479 posted on
02/18/2007 8:09:12 PM PST by
LtdGovt
("Where government moves in, community retreats and civil society disintegrates" -Janice Rogers Brown)
To: LtdGovt; JCEccles
There, I fixed it for you.Very dishonestly, I might add, unless you can show where the poster is supporting an anti-war candidate.
483 posted on
02/18/2007 8:10:17 PM PST by
dirtboy
(Duncan Hunter 08)
To: LtdGovt
Well of course we're going to elect a warrior for president. Give me a break. I wouldn't support any other. But he also needs to be a pro life and liberty full blooded conservative! I will not settle for a social liberal nominee.
The platform I want our candidate to run on is this:
- Win the war already, dammit!!
- Secure the nation, secure the borders, NOW!!
- Stop the pandering of illegals and their enablers!! Catch them and send them back!! Imprison them if they return (Chain gangs would be fine)!!
- Rebuild the military until it's the mightiest fighting force this planet has ever seen and keep it there!! And by God do not tread on us!!
- Cut government!!
- Cut spending!!
- Cut taxes!!
- Defend life and Liberty!!
- Make America great and wholesome again!!
We'll be offering the voters a clear choice between a corrupt, treasonous, socialist butcher (Hillary) standing for gloom & doom, darkness and death vs a no nonsense America loving conservative patriot!!
525 posted on
02/18/2007 8:29:26 PM PST by
Jim Robinson
(If the party runs a social liberal for president it's a kick in the teeth to its conservative base.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson