Replies

There are about 150 issues when it comes to abortion and queers

issues with which someone's not likely to be concerned once the terrorists strike and kill him.

To paraphrase Ben Franklin, "Those that would give up liberty for PERCEIVED (with a liberal RINO OR a dem in charge) security, deserve neither". As someone pointed out, MILLIONS of innocent children have been murdered by abortionists fully supported by RINO-rudy and his ilk. How many have been killed by the terrorist enemy we now face?

The point is though, that we CAN, and SHOULD, put our support behind a TRUE CONSERVATIVE who will prosecute the WoT 'til VICTORY is achieved (or, failing that, kill as many of the bastards as we possibly can) AND, and this is a BIG AND, protect and defend our 2nd Amendment RIGHTS and the right of the unborn to LIVE (among other, extremely important issues).

Also, it claims that Hillary supports the War on Terror, which is false,

Read the small print that Spiff includes.

It claims that Hillary supports the Patriot Act,

Again, read the small print.

Rudy, on the other hand, campaigned for Mike DeWine,

WONDERFUL, a flaming RINO supporting another FLAMING RINO.

It omits many important issues: crime, national security, limited government, low taxation, issues of utmost importance.

If you don't consider the LIFE or DEATH issue of Abortion, and the CONSTITUTIONAL issue of our 2nd Amendment RIGHTS, "issues of utmost importance", something is wrong with you.

Spiff has included in his chart, many related issues, but if you break the main categories down, you still have: abortion, embryonic stem cell research, the gay agenda, illegal aliens, the 2nd Amendment & gun control, the WoT, and the Patriot Act. Many of these issues are related to what you say Spiff left our. For instance, you say he left our "national security". I'd say that is included, in Spiff's chart, under the Patriot Act, WoT, illegal aliens AND our 2nd Amendment rights.

Additionally, RINO-rudy's idea of "crime" fighting, like clinton and the dems (and RINOs) "Crime Omnibus Bill of 1996", is grabbing guns from EVERYONE, including law-abiding citizens. Also, gun grabbing on a large, liberal RINO/DEM scale can NOT be accomplished with "limited" government.

As far as taxation goes, I believe someone else posted that RINO-rudy, like his liberal demonRAT brethren, had actually RAISED taxes while mayor (somebody help me with the reference to this).

I don't think Spiff would mind adding these issues to RINO-rudy's list of FAILURES as a "conservative", "moderate", or whatever he is being called by his RINO-rudy-Rooters on any given day.

RINO-rudy is 99% LIBERAL... PERIOD.

If you read and, more importantly, COMPREHEND, the MULTITUDE of issues that RINO-rudy is on the WRONG (LIBERAL) side of, you'll understand why we are so adamant about not letting this RINO get far in his run for the WH.

I don't know about all Rudy-opponents, but in most cases it seems as if people are opposing Rudy out of vanity.

As someone pointed out, MILLIONS of innocent children have been murdered by abortionists fully supported by RINO-rudy and his ilk. How many have been killed by the terrorist enemy we now face?

Comparing abortionists to terrorists is nothing short of ludicrous. A little concern for Americans who are already born, please. But it seems that you would vote for a Democrat who would end abortion, rather than for a pro-choice Republican. That makes you a socialism-enabler.

The point is though, that we CAN, and SHOULD, put our support behind a TRUE CONSERVATIVE who will prosecute the WoT 'til VICTORY is achieved (or, failing that, kill as many of the bastards as we possibly can) AND, and this is a BIG AND, protect and defend our 2nd Amendment RIGHTS and the right of the unborn to LIVE (among other, extremely important issues).

I advise that you do that. And after the primary, we will rally behind the candidate who wins the primary - whether it be your candidate or my candidates.

Read the small print that Spiff includes.

No, regardless of the small print, it's deceptive to claim that Hillary supports the WOT, or that the Dem. platform offers 'weak support' and made with malicious intent - to slander Rudy and make it look as if he is as liberal as Hillary.

WONDERFUL, a flaming RINO supporting another FLAMING RINO.

I don't care for the flaming RINO, but I do care about the control of the Senate. If the flaming RINO had been elected, we would be in control of the Senate, and control the agenda and all the committees. Is that not worth it?

If you don't consider the LIFE or DEATH issue of Abortion, and the CONSTITUTIONAL issue of our 2nd Amendment RIGHTS, "issues of utmost importance", something is wrong with you.

I don't think so. In fact, I think that anyone who risks surrender in the WOT fits that diagnosis.

Spiff has included in his chart, many related issues, but if you break the main categories down, you still have: abortion, embryonic stem cell research, the gay agenda, illegal aliens, the 2nd Amendment & gun control, the WoT, and the Patriot Act.

That's the problem, there are too many issues that affect no one, and too few issues that actually matter in people's daily lives. I'd prefer having some gay couple live in my street over dying in a terrorist attack, but others might disagree.

As far as taxation goes, I believe someone else posted that RINO-rudy, like his liberal demonRAT brethren, had actually RAISED taxes while mayor (somebody help me with the reference to this).

Actually, he cut taxes 23 times. But don't let facts get in the way of a good character assassination.

RINO-rudy is 99% LIBERAL... PERIOD.

If you had given that assertion a second of thought, you would have realized that it is sheer nonsense - unless there's something wrong with your thought processes.