Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: republicanwizard

"And as for your argument that Casey won because he is pro-life, that is nonsense."

So that is nonsense, but basically saying Ridge and Specter won solely because they are pro-abortion is not? Can you be any more dishonest?

Toomey came so close to ridding this country of Specter. What was it? 52-48?


126 posted on 02/18/2007 3:31:34 PM PST by NapkinUser (Free Ramos and Compean! Disbarment for the Nifong-wannabe Johnny Sutton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]


To: NapkinUser

Yes, in a Republican primary, the pro-choice candidate won. And most independents and Democrats are pro-choice.

So...a pro-lifer can't even win a Republican primary, and he is going to win a general. Try again.


127 posted on 02/18/2007 3:32:23 PM PST by republicanwizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

To: NapkinUser
So that is nonsense, but basically saying Ridge and Specter won solely because they are pro-abortion is not? Can you be any more dishonest?

Ridge and Specter won, despite your claims that only pro-lifers can win. And if the Democrats had nominated a pro-choicer in PA-SEN, he would have won too. A 20 point blowout means that the Pennsylvanians weren't too happy with their sitting senator.
131 posted on 02/18/2007 3:33:40 PM PST by LtdGovt ("Where government moves in, community retreats and civil society disintegrates" -Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson