Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: johnmark7
If you won't actually examine the evidence, get lost.

If scientists were required to study every crackpot theory pseudoscience had to offer, they would get nothing done. You were the one who came on here with some unbelievable, unprovable claim about unbalanced electric charges, contrary to just about everything we know about modern physics. (We're not talking about rubbing a balloon on a woolen sweater and sticking it to the ceiling). Methinks you are the one who should be examining the "evidence" again. In any case, the burden of proof is upon you, not me.

56 posted on 02/18/2007 12:34:05 PM PST by tyke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: tyke

Since you haven't clue to what you're talking about, you're talking through your hat. Refute the evidence presented or cite someone who can, or shut up and get lost.

There is nothing contrary to modern physics or astronomy in any assertions or articles I've cited. If you can find falsehoods, be my guest.

Because you know nothing about plasma physics, please do not inflict your ignorance on others.

And if you haven't looked at the results of Comet Tempel 1 and the Deep Impact experiment, you are seriosuly impaired in forming any intelligent opinion. Where is the water? And who accurately predicted the results prior to the event and have had them borne out?


57 posted on 02/18/2007 2:01:14 PM PST by johnmark7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson