To: Popman
I disagree with John on that. His purpose was to fix a problem he saw regarding the way we run campaigns in this nation. He was following a different principle, and probably leaning more toward pragmatism. This is no sin to me. So far as I can see, we still have free and spirited political campaigns.
Ronald Reagan thought McCain was a pretty good guy. So do I.
50 posted on
02/17/2007 6:37:10 AM PST by
zook
(America going insane - "Do you read Sutter Caine?)
To: zook
His purpose was to fix a problem he saw regarding the way we run campaigns in this nation. Then why did he exempt his major funding contribution organizations from the bill?
54 posted on
02/17/2007 6:41:31 AM PST by
Popman
("What I was doing wasn't living, it was dying. I really think God had better plans for me.")
To: zook
"Ronald Reagan thought McCain was a pretty good guy. So do I."
I think McCain is a good guy too. But to say he is a man who always sticks to his principles, I think is somewhat exaggerated. His record shows otherwise.
56 posted on
02/17/2007 6:43:02 AM PST by
dmw
(Aren't you glad you use common sense, don't you wish everybody did?)
To: zook
The difference between science and the fuzzy subjects is that science requires reasoning, while those other subjects merely require scholarship.
LAZARUS LONG
64 posted on
02/17/2007 6:55:07 AM PST by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
("Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson