Well, Hardaway should be very popular on Freeper...Not much 'hate the sin, love the sinner " here. Just a lot of really nasty and obscene sexual remarks every time the word gay or homosexual is mentioned.
Its the one time where Christian love takes a vacation here.
Please there must be one place where degeneracy is called degeneracy?
i don't have a problem with a man expressing his views, though i personally try not to hate people.
i read a verse in the Bible recently where Jesus said something like 'you will see tax-collectors and prostitutes entering the kingdom of heaven before you'. that doesn't mean He approved of these lifestyles, He just meant nobody is beyond hope.
well, maybe tax-collecting is an unpardonable offense. =)
Aw, lets all hold hands and take a long and deep look at ourselves. Thank you
"Its the one time where Christian love takes a vacation here."
Spare us from such idiotic blatherings please....
w
Just a lot of really nasty and obscene sexual remarks every time the word gay or homosexual is mentioned."
That's because gay or homosexual IS really nasty and obscene.
It's really none of your business what someone else thinks about sex.
"Well, Hardaway should be very popular on Freeper...Not much 'hate the sin, love the sinner " here. Just a lot of really nasty and obscene sexual remarks every time the word gay or homosexual is mentioned.
Its the one time where Christian love takes a vacation here."
I agree with you that some remarks on here are hateful, but I hope that you
don't believe that anyone who opposes the gay rights agenda is hateful.
There has been a deliberate effort by the gay rights movement to portray opponents as basically evil. Painting "them" as evil leaves one with a feeling of self-righteousness. It boils down to this: me good, you bad. It's not a particularly useful basis for discussion.
See:
http://www.parentsrightsusa.com/Overhauling%20of%20Straight%20America.htm
"The Overhauling of Straight America" (noted above) was expanded in 1989 into a book, "After the Ball: How America will conquer its fear and hatred of Gays in the 90s" by Kirk and Madsen. Here are some excerpts.
Proposed advertisements in their media campaign "can depict homophobic and homohating bigots as crude loudmouths and assholes -- people who say not only 'faggot' but 'nigger,' 'kike,' and other shameful epithets -- who are 'not Christian." It can show them being criticized, hated, shunned. It can depict gays experiencing horrific suffering as the direct result of homohatred - suffering of which even most bigots would be ashamed to be the cause. It can, in short, link homohating bigotry with all sorts of attributes the bigot would be ashamed to possess, and with social consequences he would find unpleasant and scary. The attack, therefore, is on self-image and on the pleasure in hating...
"Note that the bigot need not actually be made to believe that he is such a heinous creature, that others will now despise him, and that he has been the immoral agent of suffering. It would be impossible to make him believe any such thing. Rather, our effect is achieved without reference to facts, logic or proof. Just as the bigot became such, without any say in the matter, through repeated infralogical emotional conditioning, his bigotry can be alloyed in exactly the same way, whether he is conscious of the attack or not."