To: Robert A. Cook, PE
"Obviously there are no supernova's nearby, and none have been nearby - or we would "see" the remnants of the supernova"You just got through saying the heavy elements were created in an Snova. Look at your hand and the computer you're typing on. That's the remnant's of the Snova.
3 posted on
02/15/2007 5:18:57 PM PST by
spunkets
("Freedom is about authority", Rudy Giuliani)
To: spunkets
Er, yes. But - where are the other 10^40 left-over superN's?
My hand, about a kg, would need some 10^30 atoms, but (under conventional theory at least) you can't assume that the original superN was exactly symmetrical with our solar system's center of mass.
Or do you have to? Do we have to assume that this superN stayed stable enough long enough at exactly the center of our solar system's cloud - and the observed superN burned out in only a few weeks - to burn enough atoms to form our planets as we know them?
Further, observed supernova's eject matter - far too great a distance (Crab nebula is never going to reform into planets!) for the newly-formed nebula's to re-condense into the same system that they started from.
7 posted on
02/15/2007 5:28:53 PM PST by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson