[dirtboy]

In which case, one would think that humility and intellectual honesty would prevent you from making sweeping claims regarding the effect a President has on the # of abortions taking place,

I was countering this nonsensical spin:

It's not like he is going to personally go down and open up an abortion clinic.

And now you have the gall to question MY intellectual honesty? The same folks who have been selling Rudy as a conservative have the nerve to demand intellectual honesty from conservatives when they refuse to practice such themselves - and the conservatives are making FACTUAL CRITICISMS?

That's another stock Clintonista technique - demand from the other side what you are not doing yourself.

Are you really sure you want to even pull this crap?

[Dr. Frank fan]

I notice you didn't actually dispute the point I made, you just complained that I made it. bye,

[redgolum]

Again, I will state a simple strategy for Rudy to win, and beat HRC by a landslide. Since it is now considered ok for a GOP candidate to be pro gun control, pro abortion, and pro big government, why not have Rudy run as an anti war candidate? He doesn't have the baggage that Hillary does in this regard, and he would appeal to the anti war crowd.

Or are you just a single issue voter?