Only history. Which is far more than what you have to support your opinions.
Like how nominating the socialism-lite Bush in 2000, instead of true conservative Bob Smith, split the party and caused a "crash land". Got it.
Which is far more than what you have to support your opinions.
You still don't seem to notice that I'm not predicting Rudy will definitely win, just observing that these "train wreck" predictions are baseless. This gives me a far lower bar than you seem to think. The onus is on you to support your predictions, not on me because I'm not even really making any. Not that you've noticed.