Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GSlob

You are correct saying that Russia doesn't belong to the West and there are certain reasons for that but to me the whole thing is not so much about the culture based on religion factor. Russian elites may have contributed to the development of 'Western thought' (literature, music, science) but clearly not 'Western society'. Russia over centuries clearly developed it's own authocratic model of ruling (in which far-East bonds are most clearly visible). Like in physics heavier bodies attract other, smaller ones. And Russia clearly was large enough to feel entitled to go her own, separate way. Every time I have contact with Russians I somehow feel stubborn pride and conscious choice that has been made about it. Putin also very well epitomizes these features of Russian psyche and the dream of baroque greatness to majority of Russians. Maybe that's also where religious and political perspectives meet...? I don't know.


23 posted on 02/14/2007 3:35:42 AM PST by twinself
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: twinself

Check Charles Murray's "Human accomplishment" book. In that book he has maps - about cultural contributions, where they were coming from. Suffice it to say, from russia these were pretty small.


26 posted on 02/14/2007 5:58:00 AM PST by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: twinself
Russia over centuries clearly developed it's own authocratic model of ruling (in which far-East bonds are most clearly visible).

This is cracked. Russia looked to Louis XIV's France for its autocratic model. French, not Mongolian, was the language of the Russian royal court.

31 posted on 02/14/2007 7:40:25 AM PST by Dumb_Ox (http://kevinjjones.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson