Really? How are you computing the standard errors to determine that? And how come your standard error estimates are so much higher than every one else's?
and indicative of only a natural fluctuation.
Yes, it could be a natural fluctuation, but that doesn't mean it isn't real, which is what the Czech president seems to be saying.
You are making your error in only reading one side of the story. Do a little reading and don't accept consensus as science. I have a whole file full of articles that refute your global warming meta-narrative, but I think that it would be better if you did your own research before you make up your mind.
The problem with meta-narratives is that they create a truth that fits their overall world view, rather than prove a truth. Like Al Gore claiming that the oceans are going to rise twenty feet and swamp parts of the world. It just flat out not going to happen. The science indicates that the worst cast scenario is less than twenty inches and this was even included in the UN report on climate change. I could go on and on, but you really need to do some research on studies that aren't paid for by socialists.