To: steve-b
How is this any different than requiring all telephone companies to record all conversations? Or from requiring all cable television companies from recording what is watched and when? I don't thing the War on Terror requires that kind of sacrifice yet. If there's a question about somebody, sure check out their Internet traffic. Otherwise leave these businesses alone. A little too much fascism for me.
10 posted on
02/12/2007 9:16:39 AM PST by
rhombus
To: rhombus
>>How is this any different than requiring all telephone companies to record all conversations?<<
It isn't. Again, why I don't vote any more.
It's just too late.
16 posted on
02/12/2007 9:18:35 AM PST by
RobRoy
(Islam is a greater threat to the world today than Nazism was in 1938.)
To: rhombus
"A little too much fascism for me"
There's the problem. A little fascism is like being a little bit pregnant.
To: rhombus
How is this any different than requiring all telephone companies to record all conversations? It's not. And they don't.
The Digital Telephony Act of 1994's requires the phone companies to provide law enforcement officials with assurance that they will be able to "tap" or have access to the content of any communications incorporating new digital technology in the same way that traditional voice transmissions are currently accessible.
The phone companies do not record all telephone conversations.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson