Is there a scource to find out more about the work on this site? Has there been much documentation that a such a named place existed? Wouldn't there have to be some written references in many places, England, too?
Amici claims there's not much documentation on it because the settlement was "illegal", in that it was located closer to the "naturals" than the orders for the settlers allowed. He's supposed to present his data to several archaeologists and historians today, but they say they will be very surprised if he presents anything that they haven't already studied thoroughly.