Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: oceanview
I was against the gang of 14 too - but with 20/20 hindsight now, I was wrong, it worked out well. it prevented Roberts and most especially Alito, from being fillibustered.

I disagree strongly. What it did was perpetuate the "gentleman's filibuster", which has no place in a Constitutional Senate. Roberts and Alito would have survived a filibuster of the standard type, as the harsh light of the process revealed how baseless the Kennedy type attacks were. Instead, we got two USSC justices through without a real fight, but allowed the Dems to scuttle many, many more good appointments in the dark.

153 posted on 02/11/2007 5:34:15 PM PST by LexBaird (98% satisfaction guaranteed. There's just no pleasing some people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: LexBaird

alito would not have, there would not have been 60 votes for cloture, and there would not have been 51 votes for a rules change. so he would have not been confirmed.


161 posted on 02/11/2007 6:07:25 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson