[FairOpinion]

You really think Ron Paul is presidential material to lead the country at a time of war?

Read THIS:

Proof of Iranian Nuclear Weapons Program Demanded in US Congress [Ron Paul asks Condi]

US secretary of state, Condoleezza Rice was quizzed yesterday over the failure by the current US administration to present any form of solid evidence over Iran's alleged nuclear weapons program.

During the questioning one Republican congressman, Ron Paul told the hearing "Unproven charges against Iran's nuclear intentions are eerily reminiscent of the false charges made against Iraq."

Paul went on to say "This sounds like Iraq, where accusations came first and proof was supposed to come later – only that proof never came because the accusations turned out to be false."



http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1782812/posts

[NapkinUser]

No, I've never been a Paul supporter. I was just using him as an example. He'd still be a better republican president than Giuliani. Every republican except for maybe, MAYBE, Hagel is more conservative than Giuliani. Giuliani is a phoney and a fraud who doesn't know his place. He might have been able to do this country a great service and defeat Hillary Clinton in the senate race in 2006, but NOOOOOO, couldn't have that. He may have LOST and ruined his own selfish presidential dreams. So just let Hillary Clinton terrorize this country longer, and not ruin her chances of the white house.

Worst Viable Republican Candidate EVER