In CA the choice was Arnold or Bustamante, then Arnold vs. Angelides.
For the US in 2008 it is most likely to be Rudy vs. Hillary.
Are you saying that Bustamante and Angelides would have been better for CA and Hillary would be better for the US?
Isn't asking about whether Hillary will be good for the country futile? The Lizard Queen will be president regardless of who the Republicans nominate. It would probably be better for the country if they would just nominate her scaliness herself so everyone can rally behind her even before her coronation. If she has an R and a D, everyone can feel warm and fuzzy about _their_ repti-lesbian winning control of the empire.
Another lie. This one by omission.
There was this man named McClintock, you see...
Bringing up the recall doesn't help your cause. All it does is remind conservatives how badly they get screwed if they are tricked into voting for a Democrat with an R by their name.
At least your Arnold doesn't support partial birth abortions.
In CA the choice was Arnold or Bustamante
..
is that so?
forget about the 130 some others? without the TWirPs Q factor, the state may not be twice as deep in debt as it is and will be for years and years and have ended up continuing spending like drunken sailors at a 10% rate increase the last 3 years.
just petty details , I'm sure right?.
You lie so easily, and so grandly!
Here is the last USA Today/CNN/GALLUP poll before the recall.
"6. If the choice were between Cruz Bustamante, the Democrat and Tom McClintock, the Republican, who would you be more likely to vote for: Cruz Bustamante or Tom McClintock?"
September 25-27
Registered Voters
McClintock 49%
Bustamante 42%
Probable Voters
McClintock 56%
Bustamante 37%