Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: narses

Anyone not on the Dem ticket.

Anyone who will not socialize America's healthcare.

Anyone who will not surrender to the Islomonazis.

Anyone who has said that he believes that the FedGov has no business deciding the Abortion issue, and that stare decisis can change over decades, and anyone that actually believes that the commerce clause should not be used willy nilly to deny states rights.

Rudy fits this (my) bill. I dunno if Romney does. Hunter may actually not fit. Tancredo doesn't.

But whoever it is....I will vote, and I will vote AGAINST Hillary, Hussein Obama, etc. etc.

And you? Hello?


91 posted on 02/10/2007 4:44:26 PM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: sam_paine

"And you? Hello?"

An honest conservative.


94 posted on 02/10/2007 4:47:32 PM PST by narses ("Freedom is about authority." - Rudolph Giuliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

To: lilylangtree; narses

Come on lily. I answered your question with real answers in #91. I answered narses.

All you gave me was a Ron Paul cop-out.

Give us a real example.


96 posted on 02/10/2007 4:48:24 PM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

To: sam_paine

PS Rudy says that abortion is a right. He wants a pro-choice party. He supports the gungrabbing Brady Bill and assault weapon ban too. He derides Senator Goldwater and disses the GOP. You say he fits your bill. How odd, I thought ducks had bills and RINO's had horns.


97 posted on 02/10/2007 4:49:33 PM PST by narses ("Freedom is about authority." - Rudolph Giuliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

To: sam_paine

Anyone who has said that he believes that the FedGov has no business deciding the Abortion issue,
***What's up with that? Suddenly you dive down to details when it comes to abortion? The FedGov already decided it with Roe Vs. Wade so your position becomes academically meaningless.


and that stare decisis can change over decades,
***That's a litmus test for you? What does it mean? Why is it so important?

and anyone that actually believes that the commerce clause should not be used willy nilly to deny states rights.
***That's another interesting one. It's kinda already decided, so why is it such a big litmus test to you? How exactly does Duncan Hunter not fit the bill? Even Reagan used the commerce clause to push through the standard for 21 years old as the legal drinking age. These issues don't mean much to social conservatives that I hang around with, so why do they mean so much to you?


206 posted on 02/10/2007 10:08:20 PM PST by Kevmo (The first labor of Huntercles: Defeating the 3-headed RINO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson