Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
They had no intention of buying and selling guns retail. Maintaining an inventory. Providing a service.

Do you have a problem with self-sufficiency? Why do you think it's dishonest for these people to handle this themselves, rather than relying on, and paying someone else to provide this "service" for them when they are perfectly capable of doing it for themselves?

43 posted on 02/09/2007 7:51:00 AM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic
"Why do you think it's dishonest for these people to handle this themselves"

What, I'm supposed to explain morality to you?

"Do you have a problem with self-sufficiency?"

BWAHAHAHAHAHA! Is THAT what you call it -- self sufficiency? "They're not being dishonest, robertpaulsen, they're being self sufficient". How do you sleep at night?

They were scamming the system. They never intended to sell retail. They saw a loophole and exploited it.

And you and your ilk applaud them for it.

So I'm not going to listen to you Chicken Littles and be the least bit concerned when I see the numbers drop from 284,000 to 54,000 since it's obvious that 230,000 of those "dealers" were not dealers to begin with.

They were 230,000 examples for the gun grabbers to use against the honest dealers. You work for Sarah Brady. Admit it.

45 posted on 02/09/2007 8:06:47 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson