Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran threatens 'worldwide strike' if attacked
Daily Telegraph (UK) ^ | 2/8/07 | Natalie Paris and agencies

Posted on 02/08/2007 9:23:21 AM PST by kiriath_jearim

Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Khamenei has today warned that if under attack, Iran will hit back at US interests worldwide.

While it is not unusual for Iran to threaten such a wide-reaching response to US action, the threat was issued as details were broadcast on state television that missiles had been test-launched today.

Speaking at a meeting of Iranian air force commanders, Iran's supreme spiritual leader said: "The enemy knows well that any invasion would be followed by a comprehensive reaction to the invaders and their interests all over the world.

"We believe that no one will make such an unwise and wrong move (to attack Iran) that would endanger their country and interests."

He added: "Some say that the US president is not the type who acts based on calculations or thinks about the consequences of his action.

"But even these people can be brought to their senses."

Iran is at loggerheads with the United States over its disputed nuclear programme which has prompted Washington to order a second aircraft carrier to the Gulf to bolster US influence.

A televised broadcast today revealed that Iran's Revolutionary Guards were test-firing missiles that could apparently sink "big warships" in the Gulf, the Sea of Oman and the northern Indian Ocean.

The testing means that it is now the second day that Iran has been conducting war-games designed to be a public display of military might.

Revolutionary Guards naval commander Ali Fadavi said: "These missiles, with a maximum range of 350 km (220 miles), can hit different kinds of big warships in all of the Persian Gulf, all of the Sea of Oman and the north of the Indian Ocean."

However, Tehran insists its nuclear programme is purely civilian and says it is not backing militants in Iraq.

Both President George W Bush and Tony Blair have said that neither country intends to invade Iran.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: geopolitics; iran; islam; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last
To: kiriath_jearim
The whole problem with the mullah's logic is this:

Ff they can strike worldwide *IF* they are attacked,

then

they can strike worldwide *BEFORE* they are attacked just as easily

To me this implies that they have *already* gone to the trouble to create and deploy those assets, which is itself a very, very unfriendly thing to have done - am implies to me that their long term plans have always been to use those assets at the first genuine opportunity.

Seems to me that they should be attacked now, at our convenience and schedule, and we should not wait for them to use those "worldwide assets" at their convenience and schedule

21 posted on 02/08/2007 11:33:18 AM PST by chilepepper (The map is not the territory -- Alfred Korzybski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

Twelfth Imam bump


22 posted on 02/08/2007 3:28:29 PM PST by Dajjal (See my FR homepage for an essay about Ahmadinejad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson