Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: listenhillary
I would have used it as ammo against the WMD deniers.

With regard to the rest of the WMD claims, I've always suspected that we didn't *want* to prove that there were chemical and biological weapons anywhere in the the thousands of munitions depots spread around Iraq. Do that, and suddenly its a race against time to find them before Al Queda does.

When the story of no-WMD was being reported, it was only days after the fall of Baghdad. We didn't even know where all the munition bunkers were yet.

Beats me... but I want dibs on the credit if it is ever declassified. :-)

34 posted on 02/07/2007 4:26:55 PM PST by Ramius ([sip])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: Ramius

"With regard to the rest of the WMD claims, I've always suspected that we didn't *want* to prove that there were chemical and biological weapons anywhere in the the thousands of munitions depots spread around Iraq. Do that, and suddenly its a race against time to find them before Al Queda does."

An excellent point, and a reason I had never thought of until you mentioned it. If so, I wonder how many other Bush 'meekness' problems could also be related directly to these security issues.


43 posted on 02/07/2007 6:19:10 PM PST by Amalie (FREEDOM had NEVER been another word for nothing left to lose...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson