Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: flintsilver7

So what if they aren't as prominent? They certainly effect your life a lot more.

Back to your car analogy, though there are many other car manufacturers, only Chevy sells the SS brand. If I want an SS, I have to buy a Chevrolet. There are plenty of automobiles that will get me from point A to point B; there is but one SS, and it belongs to Chevy--which sells its products exclusively through Chevy dealers, which have exclusive territories, into which no other dealers may sell Chevrolets.

Along those same lines, there is only one Major League Baseball, but there are options for sports entertainment out the wazoo. There is minor league baseball, there is football, basketball, golf, hockey, curling, horse racing (TVG), etc. etc. Each of these sports will entertain a person. So there are general competitors to baseball, just as there are general competitors to Chevy, even though Chevy owns the SS brand. But you're ok with Chevy having an exclusive distributorship chain, but not OK with MLB doing the same?


55 posted on 02/07/2007 7:52:36 AM PST by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: Publius Valerius

I understand what you're saying, but MLB would be literally preventing millions of people from even being able to watch their games by this. Also, as I said, there is no alternative. The SS analogy doesn't work for me because there are no similar products. I would equate that to a player in MLB - possibly a team at best - but not the entire league.


56 posted on 02/07/2007 7:58:10 AM PST by flintsilver7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson