Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CottShop
Most states are for those rights as they do afford true RIGHTS- not marriage perks that heteros have

Specifically, what would they NOT have with a civil union that a married couple has? I've never read anything to indicate that a civil union was really any different from marriage. Only the names have been changed to protect the innocent.

42 posted on 02/06/2007 10:41:21 AM PST by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: MEGoody

There's issues like joint insurance that they are complaining about that they can't get- spousal benifits & such, Tax perks for married couples & such- however, there are workarounds to practically all these marriage perks already- but that isn't good enough for them- they want EVERYTHING married couples enjoy without having to do the workarounds.

Kattieanna- yep- it is quite disgusting


50 posted on 02/06/2007 10:46:12 AM PST by CottShop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson