You asserted that the girls in State care got 'used' from a very young age and at various places and you thought this vaccination was a grand idea.
My reply, if I recall, was to the effect of how do you use the fact some children have suffered abuse to justify vaccinating children that came from a stable home and had never been 'used' in their life.
And no, I can't see how anyone would think a child in a stable home does not have as high a risk of contracting HPV than someone who was 'used' while still a child and became (I believe you said)a promiscuous 13 year old. More sexual contact means higher risk...period.
If you want to take that rational argument to mean I think its 'all about sex', so be it.
If you think it means I wish death and suffering on someone because they have sex in some non-approved of manner, you're sadly mistaken.
-------
So I up your ludicrous and raise you a clueless.
I call your clueless and raise you an asinine.
Stick a fork in both of us,
We're done ;)