With all due respect, the only ones I've seen make that assertion are the PRO vaccination crowd. And they make it repeatedly. Almost as if they had a physiological fixation on the subject.
------------
So, with that in mind, I refuse to even remotely side with the anti's.
No one is guilty by association, and being cautious does not make one "anti vaccine", and "anti vaccine" does not, by default, make someone "pro cancer".
That's one of the most ludicrous rationalizations I've ever heard.
You're the one who argued that a girl being raised in a stable home wasn't as at risk either.
So I up your ludicrous and raise you a clueless.
I would so love to be wrong about my reservations. Love to.
But I don't see the sudden rush. They worked on this since 1995 and GSK is within a year of completing their vaccine. Who's to say theirs wont be better and wish we'd waited?