We've both said that we are against government mandates.
How the disease is acquired is entering into emotional judgement versus actual risk/benefit.
FDA set the standard for the number of required subjects.
It ain't easy to find virgins in that age group, who will volunteer that information these days and who will also dedicate themselves to the protocol of a study, and that is why the number of vaccinated in the studies is what you think is low.
As a contingent of licensure, long term follow up studies are dictated and that was done in this case as well. We could wait 30 years for those kinds of results, but that would mean 30 years times ~approx 3.5 thousand in the US alone die from cervical cancer.
If I had a daughter, I have goys, I'd be thrilled to have her vaccinated. Too bad, our aunts never had the opportunity.
"It ain't easy to find virgins in that age group,"
The ages tested were not the ages targeted for the vaccine. They were 16-26. I didn't see it mentioned whether they were virgins.
It's not easy to find virgins in the 11-12 year old age group. You are kidding me?
Even today, most girls are virgins until around 16.
I was talking to my middle school 12 year old son today about this vaccine. I'm pretty frank about all of this stuff, and he said most kids are not having sex in middle school and we are in liberal California.