Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Froufrou
After reading an editorial in the Rocky Mountain News, I'm skeptical about this. Because of relatively low cost but effective screening techniques like Pap smear, the incidence of this cancer has gone down to modest numbers. And the vaccine is very expensive. Is this to be paid for by the state or insurers or both?

Merck is funding the groups who are aggressively lobbying for this. It seems public health may be a camouflage for the feminists and Merck pushing not very public spirited agendas while no one is looking out for taxpayers and premium payers.

281 posted on 02/06/2007 3:52:08 PM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: colorado tanker

I quite appreciate your input. It appears some are unable to view all components of this issue objectively. Thankfully, you are not one of them.


284 posted on 02/06/2007 4:19:59 PM PST by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson