"If we in Congress don't end this war before January 2009, as president, I will."This alone could doom her chances of being elected.
2 posted on
02/06/2007 12:46:57 AM PST by
D-fendr
To: D-fendr
"If we in Congress don't end this war before January 2009, as president, I will."
She better hope things are REAL quiet between now and then. That statement was a BIG gamble - and not a bright one. It really has no significant up side but a potentially huge downside.
5 posted on
02/06/2007 1:40:49 AM PST by
RobRoy
(Islam is a greater threat to the world today than Nazism was in 1938.)
To: D-fendr
Didn't the Clinton's claim that Hillary was co-president?
Doesn't that make her term limited out now?
And just because you refuse to fight in a war doesn't mean the war ends. It just means you get slaughtered until it does.
6 posted on
02/06/2007 2:03:15 AM PST by
DB
To: D-fendr
Kennedy and other leftists are still saying that we need to use diplomacy in dealing with Iran and Syria. That is a page out of Jimmy Carter's naive "the emperor has not clothes" book. Talking to Iran would achieve nothing except us acceding to their nuke program. Of course Pat Buchanan doesn't have a problem with that either.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson