I just watched the replay. He said he is for domestic partner law and for gays to have equal rights...are you against that?
By gay "domestic partnership" he wants to give gay partners the same benefits as married couples. He wants them to be married with out being "Married" because by saying that he's for "gay marriage" he knows he commits political suicide. By saying he's for basically the same thing as gay marriage without calling it that, he can support the radical gay agenda (as he's done his entire career) while benefitting from the votes given to him by gullible Republicans who SHOULD know better.
By "equal rights" for gays, he's advocating for an openly gay military, gay adoption, etc, etc. He is advancing the radical gay agenda as fast as he can without committing political suicide within the Republican Party. But when you look at the truth - what he's said in the past when he was not running for the Republican nomination, what his policies were while he was Mayor, and the radical gay groups with which he voluntarily associated himself, you see clearly where he stands on the issue and how repulsive it is to traditional Republicans who stand by the platform.
Homosexual citizens already have the same rights as everyone else, they don't need "gay rights." We don't need any laws whatseover that mention anything to do with homosexuality.