Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MindBender26; Moonman62
If the tree branches blocked a stop sign or its roots were pulling up a sidewalk then it was an encroachment onto public property.

The city certainly could request he do something about that.

BUT if his remedy is to remove his tree then that should be his right to take the tree out altogether. If the city wants shade then it need to plant its own tree.
20 posted on 02/04/2007 7:11:08 AM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: BenLurkin
city's Department of Health and Human Services sent him a letter, which he interpreted to mean that he should trim the tree. "And it says that, 'I am responsible that I should not allow or maintain any growth of shrubs, bushes or trees to extend onto or over any portion of the public way, including sidewalks,'" he said.

The letter definetly says bushes or TREES.

24 posted on 02/04/2007 7:15:02 AM PST by AmericanMade1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson