[gidget7]

I hope you are wrong too, but alas I have seen the same thing. It is truly unbecoming of a Freeper to use the liberal talking points and key words, toward other Freepers. But I have seen it, and so have a lot of others. We do not "hate" any of the candidates, and there for are not "insert name" haters. That is a tactic used constantly on the left, and is their "game" not ours.

I too pray, we can get a true conservative elected. Some here choose rather, to have a candidate is strong on security, but would not represent conservatives on anything else. Security is important, extremely so! But it goes hand in hand with other issues, and I haven't given up that we cannot find a candidate who sees things just that way. No matter what the drive by media tells us. I refuse to allow them to pick our candidates.

[airborne]

Some here choose rather, to have a candidate is strong on security, but would not represent conservatives on anything else.

I would also point out the comments by 'Peach' in post # 127, whose sentiments I share -

"Is it too much to ask for us to get through some primaries and debates before asking people who they'll vote for?..."...I'm darned if I'm going to commit to you or anyone without seeing how these candidates handle themselves in the public arena."

I hope we can get past all the arguing and get on with the civil debate that made FreeRepublic great.