http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,,20704878-5001028,00.html
"BRITAIN'S Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecology is reportedly calling on doctors to consider euthanasing "the sickest of newborns" which it says can disable healthy families."
There we go.
And about ultrasounds?
http://rwor.org/a/1270/pregnancy-resource-center-deception.htm
"The latest weapon in the arsenal of these CPCs is showing pregnant women ultrasound images of the developing fetus, and it seems to be having a major effect on women. Focus on the Family, a Christian fascist organization that funds and promotes CPCs and has spent nearly $1.2 million on ultrasound machines, claims that nearly 70 percent of the women shown ultrasound decide against abortion." The horror! They won't CHOOSE what I want them to choose! It's NARAL's stance that ultrasounds are weapons if CPCs use them. I'm serious, they opposed funding for it from the government, which makes sense, but then they opposed funding from it from private donations. They're trying to shut these clinics down. They opposed the informed choice act, which was about showing women ultrasounds and giving them abortion alternatives, not about saying YOU CAN'T ABORT!
Good going Rudy. Stand with an organization that doesn't support a woman choosing life, it only supports a woman choosing abortion. Nice job.
If these organizations weren't so blatantly pro-abortion, I might be able to stand them. I might be able to look at Rudy Giuliani and say, well standing with a pro-choice organization can be a worthy cause because it's supporting a woman's right to bodily integrity, even if it's misguided. But that's not the sort of organization he stood with. He stood with one that is dedicated to killing babies. He was FUNDED by one that is dedicated to killing babies.
Rudy is funded by naral? As in for his presidential run?
we generally arent that far behind britian. at what point now will they consider it murder? 12 hours, 1 day, 3 months? where will it end? what about the elderly or sick?
I wonder if there is anywhere that naral states its position on euthenasia.
just when i think things cant possibly get any worse they do>:(
So let me get this right, from the "champions of choice"....
They want federal funded abortions which of course rudy supports, but you cant have federally funded ultra sound machines? Its my darn taxes, why cant i "choose" which to support?
what exuse do they have that they cant be funded by private donation? is naral now also trying to tell me what i can or cant do with our net income too?
if 70% of women opt to keep the baby, they are losing 70% of thier potential income. good. only 30% to go!
Where can i make a donation for ultra sound machines?
take that NARAL!