I don't think they have enough data to make such a conclusive decision.
NG has a really bad habbit of seeing the entire world in any old grain of sand
I don't think they have enough data to make such a conclusive decision.
btt
"not enough data to be conclusive"
I think there is a lot of pressure to say something bold on every find. I've had similar feelings on recent other news releases including the Terror Bird not living alongside humans (Florida). They only showed me where that particular find of the Terror Bird did not live alongside humans. I don't think they should extrapolate that much without adding a caveat. Maybe the news publishers want the boldness of statement to make the articles more interesting and eye catching.
I read interesting or bold statement articles so I guess the idea works.