Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: supercat
If the purpose of a firearm is to actually kill the enemy, heavier is better. If the purpose is to keep the enemy out of your line of fire, lighter is just as good.

I've also seen the argument that more, lighter rounds are better because a lighter round is more likely to wound or maim than kill outright. A dead soldier can't fight, but won't do anything to slow the rest of them down. A wounded soldier can't fight, and may force the enemy to expend time and resources taking care of him.

199 posted on 02/02/2007 4:41:24 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic
I've also seen the argument that more, lighter rounds are better because a lighter round is more likely to wound or maim than kill outright. A dead soldier can't fight, but won't do anything to slow the rest of them down. A wounded soldier can't fight, and may force the enemy to expend time and resources taking care of him.

I've read that argument frequently, and don't buy it so much. If a round is actually aimed at the enemy, heavier is better. On the other hand, if a round isn't going to hit the enemy, any weight is wasted.

200 posted on 02/02/2007 5:00:15 PM PST by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson