To: supercat
If the purpose of a firearm is to actually kill the enemy, heavier is better. If the purpose is to keep the enemy out of your line of fire, lighter is just as good.I've also seen the argument that more, lighter rounds are better because a lighter round is more likely to wound or maim than kill outright. A dead soldier can't fight, but won't do anything to slow the rest of them down. A wounded soldier can't fight, and may force the enemy to expend time and resources taking care of him.
199 posted on
02/02/2007 4:41:24 PM PST by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: tacticalogic
I've also seen the argument that more, lighter rounds are better because a lighter round is more likely to wound or maim than kill outright. A dead soldier can't fight, but won't do anything to slow the rest of them down. A wounded soldier can't fight, and may force the enemy to expend time and resources taking care of him. I've read that argument frequently, and don't buy it so much. If a round is actually aimed at the enemy, heavier is better. On the other hand, if a round isn't going to hit the enemy, any weight is wasted.
200 posted on
02/02/2007 5:00:15 PM PST by
supercat
(Sony delenda est.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson