Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ctdonath2
I know the army would never accept a 22LR.

But I think if they could develop a round that is small and expands, it would be better than a "heavy" round with lots of recoil.

I would make a expanding small round with no recoil and with 100 or 200 round magazine capability.

But then there is the Geneva Convention on ammo to that prevents that.

169 posted on 02/02/2007 2:24:36 PM PST by agincourt1415 (The Sum of all Fears: Democrats running the war or trying to run away from the war on terror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]


To: agincourt1415

The 5.56 in the M16 platform has practically no recoil.

The 5.7 round is probably what you're looking for, putting 50 rounds in a very compact CQB package. That's probably the best power/capacity tradeoff you're looking for.


174 posted on 02/02/2007 2:29:08 PM PST by ctdonath2 (The color blue tastes like the square root of 0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson