Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: untrained skeptic; Flatus I. Maximus; doorgunner69
Thanks to all for the correction and reproof - really, I mean it. Whenever I am wrong I do appreciate it whenever someone points out my inaccuracy (especially when they do so in as a tactful manner as each of you did) - so thanks.

I didn't know the Russians has developed a hollow underneith the jacket that causes the bullet to 'deform' - trust the Russians to think of that one.

Regarding the Geneva Convention and the beheadings, I am beginning to think we are the only ones to do conform to International Convention.

I know I have heard of the Hague Convention before but simply "spaced it" so - thanks to each of you...

124 posted on 02/02/2007 1:27:37 PM PST by Friend_from_the_Frozen_North (Temps were down to -40 Fahrenheit (now 30 Above); guess ALGORE is right - we have been Warmin' Up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: Friend_from_the_Frozen_North
While I'm making "corrections" I'll correct myself while I'm at it. :)

It appears the most applicable part of the Hague Convention of 1899 isn't what I quoted in my earlier response but is instead Declaration III which can be found here.

http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/lawofwar/dec99-03.htm

"Laws of War : Declaration on the Use of Bullets Which Expand or Flatten Easily in the Human Body; July 29, 1899"

I was close, but still not really correct.

163 posted on 02/02/2007 2:03:56 PM PST by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson