When the numbers are skewed with the per-hour stuff, then yes. However, if you go by annual salary (W-2's, not some mathematical conversion prorated for X), then I'd bet the rankings would be different.
Per hour is THE proper way to look at it, not "annual".
If you look at overpaid baseball players, you'll see how FAR overpaid they are when you consider they only "work" 6 mos. of the year.