Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: T'wit
Shockingly, I vote no. I see it as involuntary manslaughter. I think Michael was trying to punish Terri, not to kill her. As I figure it, he was on top of her, holding her down, unaware that she was asphyxiating. He stayed there too long.

Indeed so, but if he was proven to have caused Terri's initial collapse, I think his later actions could be easily shown to be a murderous coverup.

989 posted on 03/24/2007 10:40:32 AM PDT by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 964 | View Replies ]


To: supercat
>> I think his later actions could be easily shown to be a murderous coverup.

Maybe so! Man, this one strains legal theory, though, doesn't it? The first try was sort of an accident, then at the end it was mercy killing....... But let's look deeper.

If my theory of Terri's injuries is right, and if Carla Iyer's observations are correct that he tried to kill her with insulin as many as five times, plus we all know about the time in 1993 he tried to withhold life-saving medicine -- that is up to seven covert efforts to kill her. Then we had four open and legal efforts to kill her with court permission.

Eleven attempts at her murder!

I think the question of premeditation is pretty well solved :-)

990 posted on 03/24/2007 11:04:18 AM PDT by T'wit (Visitors: the good news is, lots of people have agreed with you. The bad news is, they were Nazis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 989 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson