[vox_freedom]

Thanks for your posts and positions on this topic and thread. Our forefathers understood the values of Life, Liberty, Property -- the first of which was LIFE. Somehow our constitution has been twisted to value murderers and those who would deprive life, rather than protect it. We need elected officials who stand up for innocents not try find legal avenues to destroy it or become apologists for it.

And no, I will not compromise on a presidential candidate who goes only part way on the life issue. The stakes are too high to vote for "a lesser of two evils" so as to get what? A half life?

[T'wit]

>> And no, I will not compromise on a presidential candidate who goes only part way on the life issue.

Thank you for kind words.

The "life" issue is the 800-pound gorilla of HillaryHealth and related socialized medicine schemes. Rush Limbaugh used to say the HillaryHealth would socialize 14% of the whole economy. The way I figure it, it would socialize 100% of the economy, assuming the other 86% of the people wanted to stay alive. Private medicine was banned, so everyone's life and health would be placed in the hands of government bureaucrats. What a swell idea, Hillary!

Oddly enough, the same folks who screech at 128 decibels about Congress "intervening" in Michael Schiavo's private murder, have nothing but glowing things to say about the prospect of government controlling every medical decision in the country, forever.