To: T'wit
The laws do not permit guardians to make decisions that would cause death or harm to the ward.I guess the courts disagreed with you.
38 posted on
02/02/2007 6:17:16 AM PST by
zarf
To: zarf; T'wit
I guess the courts disagreed with you. You mean a single judge who didn't follow the law and then had the audacity to ignore a Congressional subpoena?
I find it extremely ironic that FReepers who in all other areas seem to be aware of judicial activism/misconduct had no problem lining up behind Greer's utter disregard for the law.
39 posted on
02/02/2007 6:58:58 AM PST by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: zarf
>> I guess the courts disagreed with you.
The case was based on privacy rights, not on the guardian's right to make decisions for his ward as you wrongly explained it.
40 posted on
02/02/2007 7:03:03 AM PST by
T'wit
(In the absence of market prices, all factors of production, including people, go to waste.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson