“Michael’s supporters are staking their own intellectual reputation on a proven liar”
Anyone staking any kind of reputation on Michael doesn’t have an intellectual bone in their body.
No matter what people think about Terri’s case - one thing that was well established by those who knew Michael best (friends & family) is that he is not the brightest bulb, he is a bully, and he is controlling.
And in this week of the VTech shootings let’s consider that Michael admitted under oath he was prescribed anti-psychotic medicine but was not taking it according to doctor’s orders.
If people really want to snuggle up to him, they are going to get bitten.
We had six affidavits, two from ex-girl friends, four from nurses who took care of Terri. All six women knew him up close. They were all to some degree afraid of him. They all painted pretty much the same picture of Michael. The first word that came to all of their lips was "mean." Michael could be "incredibly mean," said Cindy Shook and Trudy Capone both. He was unfailingly mean to Terri after 1992, and used her to be mean to her family. A bully, manipulative, greedy, even a stalker. A bad liar because he sometimes lets the truth slip out, especially if he's on a rant. Certainly he lied about what caused her injuries and certainly he lied about her saying she wanted to die.
>> If people really want to snuggle up to him, they are going to get bitten.
I am holding out hope that Michael will confess. That will bring down all his fellow travelers. I mention this to them from time to time, warn that they are backing a treacherous person, but it doesn't penetrate thick skulls.
Fact is, the whole thing is a house of cards. We could get a confession from a number of people. If just one talks, down would come the house.