Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anschutz blames Cussler for $105 million film flop
LA Times ^ | 2/1/07 | Glenn Bunting

Posted on 02/01/2007 8:15:34 PM PST by BurbankKarl

Attorneys for Philip Anschutz allege as part of a lawsuit going to trial this week that author Clive Cussler duped the Denver industrialist into paying $10 million for film rights to the adventure novel "Sahara" by flagrantly inflating his book sales to more than 100 million copies.

"Cussler and his agent had gotten away with these numbers for years," said Alan Rader, Anschutz's lawyer. "It was a lie and it doomed the movie."

The claim is "ridiculous," Cussler said this morning outside a Los Angeles Superior Court room. "They wanted the book. They solicited us."

The allegations surfaced at the start of a trial that seeks to settle a long-running dispute over who is responsible for Anschutz's company losing $105 million on "Sahara," the 2005 action movie starring Matthew McConaughey and Penelope Cruz.

The trial, which includes claims of sabotage, fraud, profligate spending and racism, is expected to provide a rare, behind-the-scenes look at the often mysterious world of moviemaking. Lawyers are expected to finish picking a jury today and begin opening arguments Friday.

Among those on the witness list are Anschutz, the secretive, 67-year-old multibillionaire who shuns publicity; former Paramount Pictures Chairwoman Sherry Lansing; Breck Eisner, the son of the former Walt Disney Co. chairman; McConaughey, who also served as executive producer, and Cussler, the 75-year-old bestselling author.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: anschutz; clivecussler; hollywood; sahara
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

1 posted on 02/01/2007 8:15:35 PM PST by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tanniker Smith

book ping


2 posted on 02/01/2007 8:16:15 PM PST by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl

Heck, the book stunk too. Most of his books stink.


3 posted on 02/01/2007 8:18:49 PM PST by Cogadh na Sith (There's an open road from the cradle to the tomb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl
If they bought the rights then they generally incur the liability if it does not profit correct?
4 posted on 02/01/2007 8:19:37 PM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cogadh na Sith
It isn't that Dirk Pitt stinks. It is just that Dirk Pitt sucks so bad he holds the rest of the earth down.

Regards,

TS

5 posted on 02/01/2007 8:21:34 PM PST by The Shrew (www.swiftvets.com & www.wintersoldier.com - The Truth Shall Set YOU Free!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The Shrew

There are two Dirk Pitts now...which one?


6 posted on 02/01/2007 8:22:16 PM PST by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: BurbankKarl

Most of his books suck and thus, the movie stunk as well.

Plus you have a gay Matthew McConaughey and lesbian Penelope Cruz as the lead actors who have the on screen chemistry of.....say a gay kissing a lesbian.


8 posted on 02/01/2007 8:24:34 PM PST by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl; Victoria Delsoul

The book-to-film industry still hasn't lived down 'Johnathan Livingston Seagull.' :-)


9 posted on 02/01/2007 8:26:17 PM PST by HitmanLV (Rock, Rock, Rock and Rollergames! Rockin' & Rolling, Rockin' with Rollergames!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cogadh na Sith

His early books were my absolute favorite reads period, I lost track how many times I read Raise the Titanic, his novels the last decade though are slightly below par but still to me are good action novels. I heard the real reason Sahara stunk was it was directed buy Brock Eisner the son of Michael Eisner late CEO of the Walt Disney company.
I was upset the real main part of the film was the omission of the role Abraham Lincoln had in the storyline.If anyone wants to really know then get the original novel and read it, not the movie version.


10 posted on 02/01/2007 8:27:53 PM PST by Eye of Unk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl

It's easy to find out how many copies of a book have reportedly been sold.


11 posted on 02/01/2007 8:32:55 PM PST by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl

Steven Hunter's characters would make for a good book. Bob the Nailer or his daddy Earl Swaggert.


12 posted on 02/01/2007 8:34:36 PM PST by misterrob (Jack Bauer/Chuck Norris 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl

'Sahara' was one of the worst movies I ever had the misfortune to put into my DVD player.
I suffered through 3/4 of it before I yanked it out and threw it away.


13 posted on 02/01/2007 8:38:48 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Let me add for clarification that 'Sahara' was at least as bad as 'The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen' and Peter Jackson's 'King Kong'. Movies just don't get any worse.


14 posted on 02/01/2007 8:42:04 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: misterrob

W.E.B. Griffith has good characters in his Corps series too.


15 posted on 02/01/2007 8:46:55 PM PST by stumpy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Proud_USA_Republican

Penelope Cruz, lesbian? When did that happen?


16 posted on 02/01/2007 8:53:19 PM PST by ChocChipCookie (Homeschool like your kids' lives depend on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl

I guess I'll be the one to disagree. Although I like Cussler's books, at least until the mid 90's, I also throughly enjoyed this movie.

There was no way to fit in although the different plots from the book. Good action, good characters, and a fun movie that the whole family can see. No nudity or extreme language.


17 posted on 02/01/2007 9:00:10 PM PST by packrat35 (Beware the Big Government Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl

Also I want to add that Cussler did everything he could to sabotage the movie. He is a control freak that went crazy when they made changes to the book.


18 posted on 02/01/2007 9:01:24 PM PST by packrat35 (Beware the Big Government Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChocChipCookie

She's not. Some people are just jealous.


19 posted on 02/01/2007 9:02:00 PM PST by packrat35 (Beware the Big Government Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl
I'm (yawn) outraged (yawn)!!!!!!!!!!!

FMCDH(BITS)

20 posted on 02/01/2007 9:04:57 PM PST by nothingnew (I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson