That's not the point of the debate. The point of the debate is that Rudy is a liberal, who holds views in oppoisition to the majority of the Republican Party Platform and offensive to the base, and he's attempting to be the Republican Party nominee and hijack the party in the process. We'll talk about demanding Republicans vote for a less acceptable candidate in the General Election after the Primary is over. Until then, conservatives need to work to keep the anti-Republican liberal out of the nomination.
"Until then, conservatives need to work to keep the anti-Republican liberal out of the nomination."
And I think we are. But you didn't post a graph with what Newt says or Hunter or Romney. IIRC you posted a graph that had Guiliani, Clinton, the Democrats and the Republicans. People keep forgetting that Republicans aren't necessarily Conservatives.
That's what killed us in November. It is time to start discerning the two.
And that is not truthful. I think I provided you a link the other night to the 2004 Republican Platform, your chart doesn't even begin to capture it in its entirety.
Rudy is a fiscal, domestic, and foreign policy conservative that supports strict constructionist judges. That's certainly not my definition of a liberal. However, I can see where an unpragmatic, all or nothing, right wing extremist could find that liberal.