Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pabianice

I would imagine that it would require the liberal sources of information to also provide an opposing point of view, otherwise they would be in violation of the act.
Or am I wrong?


24 posted on 01/30/2007 7:02:16 PM PST by pennboricua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: pennboricua
I volunteer to serve as the alternative point of view for ANY Conservative talk show in existence. Most of them really aren't all that conservative (as we, here on FR, know), and that ought to satisfy the law eh?!

I'd simply check FR on a daily basis to prepare my new material for this purpose.

33 posted on 01/30/2007 7:10:12 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: pennboricua

You are joking, right?


49 posted on 01/30/2007 7:35:45 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: pennboricua

The Government will just state that ABCCBSNBC etc is not liberal or slanted and taking a side...isn't that what they are doing right now?


67 posted on 01/31/2007 5:44:43 AM PST by Getsmart64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson