Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gvrlady

I would have to consider the facts but if he's out there waving a gun then he would have had to assume some risk for his behaviour.


30 posted on 01/30/2007 2:12:28 PM PST by misterrob (Jack Bauer/Chuck Norris 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: misterrob
"I would have to consider the facts but if he's out there waving a gun then he would have had to assume some risk for his behaviour."

Best thing to do in that circumstance is kill 'em first and ask questions later.

Giving bad guys or cops a chance just gets you killed.

38 posted on 01/30/2007 2:26:25 PM PST by GourmetDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: misterrob
...but if he's out there waving a gun then he would have had to assume some risk for his behaviour.

Apparently he did take responsibility for his behavior. It seems you are suggesting that a citizen has no right to bear arms on his own property. Where in this situation did the cops take responsibility for their behavior?

94 posted on 01/30/2007 9:08:37 PM PST by TigersEye (Carrying a gun is a social obligation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: misterrob

I would have to consider the facts but if he's out there waving a gun then he would have had to assume some risk for his behaviour.
.....

Yes , but he thought he was confronting street thugs ... not state thugs ... one is more apt to open fire then the other.

Ordinary street thugs would have moved on down the block a bit ... shooting grandpas is bad for bis don'tcha ya know.
On the other hand a good shoot can get a state thug a paid vacation.
Sad times.


130 posted on 01/31/2007 5:30:37 AM PST by THEUPMAN (####### comment deleted by moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson