[Txsleuth]

Yeah...you are probably right...

But, by talking up Duncan Hunter, who many hadn't even heard of perhaps, until this thread...all of sudden we are being told he can't win...so forget it??

I don't understand ...I will admit that I may be too intense...but how about people that are being too dismissive???

Why not give the guy a chance, rather than bring out "history" as an excuse???

I don't think history should be a consideration..we are living in the NOW.

Also...if none of us do back Hunter, he won't get the publicity that McCain, Guiliani and others have gotten by the MSM...and what IF, he would have been the best..but doesn't get off the ground (so to speak)??

For the 100%ers, he is very strong on Border Control!!!!

[beyond the sea]

"Why not give the guy a chance, rather than bring out "history" as an excuse??? ............ I don't think history should be a consideration..we are living in the NOW."

Thank you for that.

[samantha]

He can be very useful especially if the Conservatives are paying attention to him, and get out of their funk and start getting involved. He can Be very articulate and slap the Rats around, and even make them look even more anti- Military than they already do. You can be excited about a candidate, and back them, send money or whatever. You just have to remember how Conservatives are portrayed by the Rats and the DBM, and try not to think about just one Candidate. I was late to the Allen as the favorite Camp, and still ended up very disappointed because he was a potentionally great candidate that The Washington Compost ruined with a running diatribe every day about him. He was not ready for prime time anyway, but he was looking really good, and that is why the Media had to destroy him.