I don't understand how you think Huckabee would be stronger? Hunter is outspoken and will set the media/Demonrats straight. Plus, he is more steady in his positions. Huckabee is all wishy washy on the war. Take into account Hunter's expertise as chairman and now ranking member of the Armed Services Committee and the fact he is indeed a combat vet who served in Vietnam with a son who served in Iraq and that does have an effect on the public. Hunter is a strong all-around candidate when people see and hear from him. http://www.gohunter08.com
I'm starting to come around to see it your way. I think Huckabee has a strong advantage, he comes across as very likeable even to libs. But Hunter is definitely better at setting the record straight and Hunter would be better on national security, in which Huckabee appears week.
We definitely have to rally around someone fast. Hunter and Huckabee are far better than any of the others. The more national security becomes the main issue, and it might, the better Hunter looks. If it's a bland election then Huckabee would come across better - but come to think of it, I doubt it will be.
Thanks for setting the record straight. I think you're changing at least my mind.