Huckabee seems to be the only credible conservative candidate worth his muster, would be an excellent candidate in the General Election and stands by his principles.
At this point Conservatives need to band together quickly around a candidate before McCain and Giuliani take up all the coverage and out of all the candidates Huckabee is definitely the best. In fact, he's the best choice for many reasons.
You just posed the question of the day. Do we embrace a conservative candidate to the bitter end or embrace someone who is not so conservative yet seems to have polling data that beats hillary in a gen. election? Still not quite ceratain on that one myself.
It's the question of the day and I have yet to hear a really good answer. I keep looking for a Ronald Reagan II but can't find one.
(is Rudy a morphed RR II for the 2,000's?)
Duncan Hunter. Huckabee is a empty suit. All talk no action.
I wouldn't rally to Huckabee's side like you seem to think conservatives should do. He is wobbly on Iraq. Duncan Hunter is the candidate conservatives should rally to.