Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: UpAllNight
-- Both parties were absolutists about their imagined powers...

Nor does administrating our laws give you godlike powers over your peers.--

What is "godlike" about trying to use a legal easement in the maintenance of the system for which that easement was legally granted?

From what I've read, the local officials were being absolutist's about their powers. So was Watson. -- Obviously, you back up the officials. --- I back up Constitutional restraints on ALL absolutists.

OBTW, you keep ducking my earlier concern where you called me a gun-grabber for agreeing with the GA bill.

You imagine a lot of weird things. I don't 'duck', I just ignore obsessive behavior.

Does that mean you have retracted your support for the GA bill?

We went over this not long ago:

UpAllNight wrote:
tpaine -- THIS ISSUE is much bigger than parking lots. -- I agree.
But that was the issue you put to me originally and the one we were discussing. Are you now disagreeing with the GA law? Are you saying that the GA law which is consistent with my position is a gun-grabbing law? I thought you agreed with it?

You seem obsessed with your vision of what the GA bill meant to achieve. -- Why is that, considering that you agree:

"--The issue is carrying a firearm in your private vehicle for protection of yourself and your family when you are traveling to and from work, to and from shopping and to and from any place law-abiding citizens normally go in the course of daily routines. --

-- whether I agreed with it or not even though my position as posted to you before I saw the bill agreed with the bill. I say I agree with the bill, you say you agree with it but you called me a gun grabber. I ask you again, DO YOU AGREE WITH THE GA BILL?

Asked and answered way back in the thread. Get a new obsession.

609 posted on 01/28/2007 12:31:38 PM PST by tpaine (" My most important function on the Supreme Court is to tell the majority to take a walk." -Scalia <)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 568 | View Replies ]


To: tpaine

--Asked and answered way back in the thread. Get a new obsession.--

I assume you are referring to where you agreed with the GA bill and have not changed that position. You are aware that the bill allows employers to prohibit employees from bringing weapons onto the employers' private property. Is that why you called me a gun grabber for supporting the GA bill?


610 posted on 01/28/2007 12:35:33 PM PST by UpAllNight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 609 | View Replies ]

To: tpaine

"--The issue is carrying a firearm in your private vehicle for protection of yourself and your family when you are traveling to and from work, to and from shopping and to and from any place law-abiding citizens normally go in the course of daily routines. --

That was not the issue YOU raised with me. Seems you are changing your tune away from the "employees' right to bring a weapon to work with him."


612 posted on 01/28/2007 12:37:15 PM PST by UpAllNight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 609 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson