To: zbigreddogz
I do understand easements. Of course, no one is allowed to do illegal things on their private property - it has always been understood you don't have completely unfettered control over your property if that could result in harm to yourself or to other people. What I was getting it is restrictions on the LAWFUL enjoyment of our property that are being imposed by government beyond what is necessary to preserve the safety of the community. The real issue then is when does private property cease being private in character? That's the issue.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
37 posted on
01/27/2007 2:12:49 PM PST by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: goldstategop
The real issue then is when does private property cease being private in character? That's the issue. I agree, but I don't see how you can fairly say a man is justified in violently stopping someone from putting in a pubic sewer when there is an easement for that purpose.
That's what you seemed to be saying to me, sorry if I misunderstood.
To: goldstategop
I do understand easements. Of course, no one is allowed to do illegal things on their private property - it has always been understood you don't have completely unfettered control over your property if that could result in harm to yourself or to other people. Bingo..
We are all "fettered" by our Laws of the Land. -- Far to many laws of course..
95 posted on
01/27/2007 2:58:53 PM PST by
tpaine
(" My most important function on the Supreme Court is to tell the majority to take a walk." -Scalia <)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson