They exist, and I support them. I don't agree - as you do, - that they can be used to facilitate gungrabbing by businessmen.
-- You admit that businessmen should have the power to ban guns; -- that's gungrabbing, and to say so is not rude.
Property rights either give the possessor limiting powers over others or they do not.
Properly rights are not absolute. Read the article I just posted for proof.
You believe they do not.
I don't agree - as you do, - that they can be used to facilitate gungrabbing by businessmen.
I don't know why you keep arguing with yourself over this.
I'm arguing with your anti-constitutional concepts..
You want your rights to override mine. I got it.
You're the one in favor of "overriding" our right to carry; not me.
I'm armed and prepared for you to attempt it.
Dream on that you've scared anyone.
Sorry didn't get any farther than that, as its a blatant mistatement of your position. You want to dictate to others what they must do with and on their property. Precisous little is left of property rights after that.